The smart Trick of conviction attempt to murder case law pakistan That No One is Discussing
The smart Trick of conviction attempt to murder case law pakistan That No One is Discussing
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Compact fees utilize.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents from the boy or Lady will not approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they might do if they could cut off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that's a major, the few is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—will be the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Regulation professors traditionally have played a much smaller role in producing case law in common law than professors in civil law. Because court decisions in civil legislation traditions are historically brief[four] and not formally amenable to establishing precedent, much from the exposition from the law in civil law traditions is done by academics relatively than by judges; this is called doctrine and should be published in treatises or in journals for instance Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common legislation courts relied very little on legal scholarship; So, within the turn of the twentieth century, it absolutely was very rare to determine an instructional writer quoted in a very legal decision (apart from Most likely for that tutorial writings of popular judges which include Coke and Blackstone).
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the regulation when it is actually unclear how it relates to any given situation, typically rendering judgments based over the intent of lawmakers as well as the circumstances of the case at hand. These types of decisions become a guide for long run similar cases.
ten. Without touching the merits on the case on the issue of once-a-year increases in the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision with the provincial government, these once-a-year increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, necessitates further assessment to be made through the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
five hundred,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Just about every along with the same shall be saved within the police station to your effect that no harm shall be caused towards the petitioners. 5. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. As a result, this petition is admissible based on recognized court precedents, as well as the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should manage to deduce the logic from the decision and also the statutes.[four]
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have read the acquired counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession from the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this aspect for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled website to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.